From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4B7233858C33; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 02:24:34 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4B7233858C33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1667096674;
	bh=RWkbWRAUFkcaXaEvVY6SsK7wOgM/0i6wGk3aP+J53ac=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Oakd/iOtgK4iy3w86odiSdde7LCsNfr8ZiLtpwF+IFoMmQ5NhtEaeJEsFZx9GA7tF
	 muvqag4UNmUAIK0/bOm529CC14nuWA8c8qemhA8IrQB2rFFxMnXPLrPdbfJlhYNYfq
	 WbVrjEku+7hYC/2XAHwY1rf1k+oH404Zx7bfuY9s=
From: "zhongyunde at huawei dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/104611] memcmp/strcmp/strncmp can be optimized when the
 result is tested for [in]equality with 0 on aarch64
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 02:24:29 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: zhongyunde at huawei dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-104611-4-lmUa1IgohY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-104611-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-104611-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104611

--- Comment #3 from vfdff <zhongyunde at huawei dot com> ---
  As the load instructions usually have long latency, so do it need some ex=
tra
restrict when we try this transformation?=