From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8CE8E385C419; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 17:35:08 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8CE8E385C419 From: "roi.jacobson1 at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/104615] New: [Concepts] ICE in explicit instantiation when multiple candidates are valid (CWG2421) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 17:35:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: roi.jacobson1 at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 17:35:08 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104615 Bug ID: 104615 Summary: [Concepts] ICE in explicit instantiation when multiple candidates are valid (CWG2421) Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: roi.jacobson1 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- #include template struct B { int f() requires (!std::same_as) { return 0; } int f() requires (!std::same_as && !std::same_as) { return 1; } }; template struct B; This crashes GCC with ":12:23: error: Two symbols with same comdat_group are not linked by the same_comdat_group list." as both functio= ns are compiled and have the same mangling. Also, CWG2421 is still open about what the actual behavior should be in this case.=