From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BCC483858C83; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 13:25:15 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BCC483858C83 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/104637] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE: maximum number of LRA assignment passes is achieved (30) with -Og -fno-forward-propagate -mavx since r9-5221-gd8fcab689435a29d Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 13:25:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, ra X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 13:25:15 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104637 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- If I change the testcase to following (so that it doesn't rely on __builtin_convertvector), it started ICEing with r0-122162-gb7aa4e9afcd3da4f09d6f982a663ea2094b1f2cf typedef short __attribute__((__vector_size__ (64))) U; typedef unsigned long long __attribute__((__vector_size__ (32))) V; typedef long double __attribute__((__vector_size__ (64))) F; int i; U u; F f; void foo (char a, char b, _Complex char c, V v) { u =3D (U) { u[0] / 0, u[1] / 0, u[2] / 0, u[3] / 0, u[4] / 0, u[5] / 0, u= [6] / 0, u[7] / 0, u[8] / 0, u[0] / 0, u[9] / 0, u[10] / 0, u[11] / 0, u[12] / 0, u[13] / 0, u[14] / 0, u[15] / 0, u[16] / 0, u[17] / 0, u[18] / 0, u[19] / 0, u[20] / 0, u[21] / = 0, u[22] / 0, u[23] / 0, u[24] / 0, u[25] / 0, u[26] / 0, u[27] / 0, u[28] / 0, u[29] / = 0, u[30] / 0, u[31] / 0 }; c +=3D i; f =3D (F) { v[0], v[1], v[2], v[3] }; i =3D (char) (__imag__ c + i); } In any case, I don't see anything wrong on the GIMPLE side and it isn't cle= ar on reloading which insn it is ICEing.=