From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 8791B3858C83; Tue,  1 Mar 2022 15:28:48 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8791B3858C83
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/104717] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE:
 verify_ssa failed (Error: type mismatch between an SSA_NAME and its symbol)
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 15:28:48 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openacc
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-104717-4-A9r4H0VF3k@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-104717-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-104717-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 15:28:48 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104717

--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #5)
> However, somehow the A.3 remains part of the BLOCK_VARS of foo, so when i=
pa
> inline (activated by pta-ipa, which does node->get_body ()) inlines foo i=
nto
> main, it does a remap of block-var A.3, and then a remap of its value-expr
> A.14, and then a remap of its TREE_TYPE.  Which has the effect of changing
> the TREE_TYPE of A.14 in foo.0._omp_fn.0.

Thomas, Jakub, any idea what the expected behaviour is here?

Should A.3 be a part of the BLOCK_VARS of foo, or not?=