public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug d/104740] New: gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL
@ 2022-03-01 13:09 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-01 13:10 ` [Bug d/104740] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-01 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740
Bug ID: 104740
Summary: gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
Assignee: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: sparc*-sun-solaris2.11, i686-pc-linux-gnu
Since 20211130, several D tests FAIL on both SPARC (32 and 64-bit) and
Linux/i686:
+FAIL: gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d:5:37: error:
undefined identifier 'int4', did you mean variable 'i4'?
[...]
+FAIL: gdc.test/compilable/b18489.d output-exists b18489.s
compilable/b18489.d:4:8: error: undefined identifier 'double2'
+UNRESOLVED: gdc.test/runnable/ice21727.d compilation failed to produce
executable
+UNRESOLVED: gdc.test/runnable/ice21727.d -shared-libphobos compilation
failed to produce executable
runnable/ice21727.d:11:12: error: undefined identifier 'float4', did you mean
struct 'Float4'?
Strangely, the failures don't occur for a x86_64-pc-linux-gnu gdc with -m32.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug d/104740] gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL 2022-03-01 13:09 [Bug d/104740] New: gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-01 13:10 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-01 21:32 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org ` (4 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-01 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740 Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |12.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug d/104740] gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL 2022-03-01 13:09 [Bug d/104740] New: gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-01 13:10 ` [Bug d/104740] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-01 21:32 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org 2022-03-02 9:49 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ` (3 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org @ 2022-03-01 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org> --- b18489.d and ice21727.d were fixed in the last sync (r12-7414). Only simd_ctfe.d is outstanding. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug d/104740] gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL 2022-03-01 13:09 [Bug d/104740] New: gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-01 13:10 ` [Bug d/104740] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-01 21:32 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org @ 2022-03-02 9:49 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2022-04-04 9:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2022-03-02 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- > --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org> --- > b18489.d and ice21727.d were fixed in the last sync (r12-7414). Good: I just saw that in last night's bootstrap. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug d/104740] gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL 2022-03-01 13:09 [Bug d/104740] New: gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL ro at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2022-03-02 9:49 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2022-04-04 9:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-04 9:29 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org 2022-04-05 11:32 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-04 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6b786d749812542dae90db1701a3cfdccfa1e4b commit r12-7978-gf6b786d749812542dae90db1701a3cfdccfa1e4b Author: Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> Date: Sun Apr 3 20:42:20 2022 +0200 d: Compile simd_ctfe.d only on avx_runtime or vect_sizes_16B_8B targets PR d/104740 gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d: Compile with target avx_runtime or vect_sizes_16B_8B. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug d/104740] gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL 2022-03-01 13:09 [Bug d/104740] New: gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL ro at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2022-04-04 9:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-04 9:29 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org 2022-04-05 11:32 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org @ 2022-04-04 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740 Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org> --- I think all are covered now. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug d/104740] gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL 2022-03-01 13:09 [Bug d/104740] New: gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL ro at gcc dot gnu.org ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2022-04-04 9:29 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org @ 2022-04-05 11:32 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2022-04-05 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- > --- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org> --- > I think all are covered now. Yes and no: while the test is now UNSUPPORTED on SPARC, it also became UNSUPPORTED on x86 (both 32 and 64-bit) where it previously PASSed. ISTM the requirements have become too strict now. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-05 11:32 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-03-01 13:09 [Bug d/104740] New: gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-01 13:10 ` [Bug d/104740] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-01 21:32 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org 2022-03-02 9:49 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2022-04-04 9:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-04 9:29 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org 2022-04-05 11:32 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).