public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug d/104740] New: gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL
@ 2022-03-01 13:09 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-01 13:10 ` [Bug d/104740] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-01 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740
Bug ID: 104740
Summary: gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
Assignee: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: sparc*-sun-solaris2.11, i686-pc-linux-gnu
Since 20211130, several D tests FAIL on both SPARC (32 and 64-bit) and
Linux/i686:
+FAIL: gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d:5:37: error:
undefined identifier 'int4', did you mean variable 'i4'?
[...]
+FAIL: gdc.test/compilable/b18489.d output-exists b18489.s
compilable/b18489.d:4:8: error: undefined identifier 'double2'
+UNRESOLVED: gdc.test/runnable/ice21727.d compilation failed to produce
executable
+UNRESOLVED: gdc.test/runnable/ice21727.d -shared-libphobos compilation
failed to produce executable
runnable/ice21727.d:11:12: error: undefined identifier 'float4', did you mean
struct 'Float4'?
Strangely, the failures don't occur for a x86_64-pc-linux-gnu gdc with -m32.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug d/104740] gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL
2022-03-01 13:09 [Bug d/104740] New: gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-03-01 13:10 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-01 21:32 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-01 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug d/104740] gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL
2022-03-01 13:09 [Bug d/104740] New: gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-01 13:10 ` [Bug d/104740] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-03-01 21:32 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
2022-03-02 9:49 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org @ 2022-03-01 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org> ---
b18489.d and ice21727.d were fixed in the last sync (r12-7414).
Only simd_ctfe.d is outstanding.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug d/104740] gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL
2022-03-01 13:09 [Bug d/104740] New: gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-01 13:10 ` [Bug d/104740] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-01 21:32 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
@ 2022-03-02 9:49 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2022-04-04 9:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2022-03-02 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org> ---
> b18489.d and ice21727.d were fixed in the last sync (r12-7414).
Good: I just saw that in last night's bootstrap.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug d/104740] gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL
2022-03-01 13:09 [Bug d/104740] New: gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-03-02 9:49 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2022-04-04 9:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-04 9:29 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
2022-04-05 11:32 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-04 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6b786d749812542dae90db1701a3cfdccfa1e4b
commit r12-7978-gf6b786d749812542dae90db1701a3cfdccfa1e4b
Author: Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org>
Date: Sun Apr 3 20:42:20 2022 +0200
d: Compile simd_ctfe.d only on avx_runtime or vect_sizes_16B_8B targets
PR d/104740
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d: Compile with target avx_runtime or
vect_sizes_16B_8B.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug d/104740] gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL
2022-03-01 13:09 [Bug d/104740] New: gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-04 9:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-04 9:29 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
2022-04-05 11:32 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org @ 2022-04-04 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740
Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org> ---
I think all are covered now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug d/104740] gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL
2022-03-01 13:09 [Bug d/104740] New: gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-04 9:29 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
@ 2022-04-05 11:32 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2022-04-05 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org> ---
> I think all are covered now.
Yes and no: while the test is now UNSUPPORTED on SPARC, it also became
UNSUPPORTED on x86 (both 32 and 64-bit) where it previously PASSed.
ISTM the requirements have become too strict now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-05 11:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-03-01 13:09 [Bug d/104740] New: gdc.dg/simd_ctfe.d etc. FAIL ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-01 13:10 ` [Bug d/104740] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-01 21:32 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
2022-03-02 9:49 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2022-04-04 9:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-04 9:29 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
2022-04-05 11:32 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).