* [Bug d/104749] [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86
2022-03-01 19:13 [Bug d/104749] New: [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-03-01 19:18 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-01 19:18 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-01 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104749
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 52540
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52540&action=edit
32-bit i386-pc-solaris2.11 statementsem.s with gdc 9.1.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug d/104749] [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86
2022-03-01 19:13 [Bug d/104749] New: [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-01 19:18 ` [Bug d/104749] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-03-01 19:18 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-01 19:18 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-01 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104749
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 52541
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52541&action=edit
32-bit i386-pc-solaris2.11 typesem.s with gdc 9.1.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug d/104749] [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86
2022-03-01 19:13 [Bug d/104749] New: [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-01 19:18 ` [Bug d/104749] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-01 19:18 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-03-01 19:18 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-02 8:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-01 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104749
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug d/104749] [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86
2022-03-01 19:13 [Bug d/104749] New: [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-03-01 19:18 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-03-02 8:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-02 9:39 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
` (10 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-02 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104749
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So this is a gdc 9.1.0 bug then, not a GCC 12 issue? (did you try 9.3?)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug d/104749] [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86
2022-03-01 19:13 [Bug d/104749] New: [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-03-02 8:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-03-02 9:39 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2022-03-03 12:11 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
` (9 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2022-03-02 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104749
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> So this is a gdc 9.1.0 bug then, not a GCC 12 issue? (did you try 9.3?)
It seems so, yes. Yet gdc 9.1.0 was good enough until now, and if
there's an issue, the requirement should at least be documented.
I'm currently running a bootstrap with gdc 11.1.0 instead, which is well
into make check.
Will try gdc 9.4.0 (which is currently building, switching from gas 2.32
to 2.38 if that matters) afterwards.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug d/104749] [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86
2022-03-01 19:13 [Bug d/104749] New: [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-03-02 9:39 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2022-03-03 12:11 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2022-03-03 12:35 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2022-03-03 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104749
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot
> Will try gdc 9.4.0 (which is currently building, switching from gas 2.32
> to 2.38 if that matters) afterwards.
Both gdc 11.1.0 and gdc 9.4.0 work fine.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug d/104749] [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86
2022-03-01 19:13 [Bug d/104749] New: [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-03-03 12:11 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2022-03-03 12:35 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
2022-03-09 10:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org @ 2022-03-03 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104749
--- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org> ---
Just having a look around, I couldn't see anywhere that `___s` would be created
now.
Then I came across r9-8460, which was fixed for 10.1.0, and backported before
9.4.0 was released. Linked bug report is pr d/94240.
In that case then, earlier versions of version 9 might not work correctly.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug d/104749] [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86
2022-03-01 19:13 [Bug d/104749] New: [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-03-03 12:35 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
@ 2022-03-09 10:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-06 8:32 ` [Bug d/104749] [12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-09 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104749
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |documentation
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So maybe amend install.texi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug d/104749] [12/13 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86
2022-03-01 19:13 [Bug d/104749] New: [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2022-03-09 10:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-06 8:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-08 8:17 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-06 8:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104749
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|12.0 |12.2
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 12.1 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 12.2.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug d/104749] [12/13 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86
2022-03-01 19:13 [Bug d/104749] New: [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-06 8:32 ` [Bug d/104749] [12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-11-08 8:17 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 10:24 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-11-08 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104749
--- Comment #10 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 107552 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug d/104749] [12/13 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86
2022-03-01 19:13 [Bug d/104749] New: [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2022-11-08 8:17 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-11-10 10:24 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-07 12:06 ` [Bug d/104749] [12/13 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link with GDC 9.1 tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-11-10 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104749
Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2022-11-10
CC| |tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I recently started running into such an issue also for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu,
which I determined to be due to recent commit
r13-3560-g7e7ebe3e350fde90fe49ab41ce3b92a811bb6370 "d: Merge upstream dmd,
druntime e4f8919591, phobos 3ad507b51" -- just like what was recently discussed
in PR107552 "[13 regression] stage 1 d21 fails to link on Linux/x86_64", which
got marked a duplicate of this PR104749.
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #6)
> [...] r9-8460, which was fixed for 10.1.0, and backported before 9.4.0 was released. Linked bug report is pr d/94240.
>
> In that case then, earlier versions of version 9 might not work correctly.
So I understand that's what we're running into, both for the "Solaris/x86"
configuration originally reported here, and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu as per PR107552
and my own findings?
We've got a report that:
(In reply to ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE from comment #5)
> gdc 9.4.0 work fine.
..., but 'gcc/doc/install.texi' still states that "you need a working GDC
compiler (GCC version 9.1 or later)", thus:
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> So maybe amend install.texi
... let's do that -- or is something else still to be investigated here?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug d/104749] [12/13 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link with GDC 9.1
2022-03-01 19:13 [Bug d/104749] New: [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2022-11-10 10:24 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-12-07 12:06 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-20 13:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-12-07 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104749
Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[12/13 regression] stage1 |[12/13 regression] stage1
|d21 fails to link on |d21 fails to link with GDC
|Solaris/x86 |9.1
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #6)
> Just having a look around, I couldn't see anywhere that `___s` would be
> created now.
>
> Then I came across r9-8460, which was fixed for 10.1.0, and backported
> before 9.4.0 was released. Linked bug report is pr d/94240.
>
> In that case then, earlier versions of version 9 might not work correctly.
I have, by the way, confirmed that cherry-picking commit
r9-8460-ge926d076f28a91f3ea30bd0bcfa1f25958fdb59e "d: Fix ICE in
add_symbol_to_partition_1, at lto/lto-partition.c:215" on top of GCC 9.1 does
resolve the issue discussed here (for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu).
... but for 'gcc/doc/install.texi' we'd rather state "GDC compiler (GCC version
9.4 or later)", I suppose.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug d/104749] [12/13 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link with GDC 9.1
2022-03-01 19:13 [Bug d/104749] New: [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-07 12:06 ` [Bug d/104749] [12/13 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link with GDC 9.1 tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-12-20 13:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-20 13:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-20 13:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-12-20 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104749
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener <rguenth@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05b7cf52e1b640271900894a894da2d27ef90092
commit r13-4805-g05b7cf52e1b640271900894a894da2d27ef90092
Author: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Date: Tue Dec 20 14:34:01 2022 +0100
d/104749 - document host GDC version requirement
This documents that GDC 9.4 or later is required to build the D
language rather than GDC 9.1 which suffers from PR94240.
PR d/104749
* doc/install.texi (GDC): Document GDC 9.4 or later is required
to build the D language frontend.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug d/104749] [12/13 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link with GDC 9.1
2022-03-01 19:13 [Bug d/104749] New: [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-20 13:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-12-20 13:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-20 13:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-12-20 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104749
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
<rguenth@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1bdb13071f0ead3c83390ac9fcc0be73a2607a42
commit r12-9001-g1bdb13071f0ead3c83390ac9fcc0be73a2607a42
Author: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Date: Tue Dec 20 14:34:01 2022 +0100
d/104749 - document host GDC version requirement
This documents that GDC 9.4 or later is required to build the D
language rather than GDC 9.1 which suffers from PR94240.
PR d/104749
* doc/install.texi (GDC): Document GDC 9.4 or later is required
to build the D language frontend.
(cherry picked from commit 05b7cf52e1b640271900894a894da2d27ef90092)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug d/104749] [12/13 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link with GDC 9.1
2022-03-01 19:13 [Bug d/104749] New: [12 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link on Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-20 13:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-12-20 13:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-12-20 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104749
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread