From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 74B0E3858C74; Mon,  7 Mar 2022 08:03:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 74B0E3858C74
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/104763] [12 Regression] Generate wrong assembly code
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 08:03:46 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed target_milestone
 assigned_to bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-104763-4-PZvUvNyMTn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-104763-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-104763-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 08:03:46 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104763

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-03-07
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Target Milestone|---                         |12.0
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |rguenth at gcc dot =
gnu.org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think we have a duplicate somewhere involving EH.  The key here is that we
are missing the VUSE on the "return" - and in this case it's (again) missing
the
return, just with using an endless loop (the other PR has a EH re-throw or =
so).=