From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 4A3CF3858C74; Mon,  7 Mar 2022 12:05:03 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4A3CF3858C74
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/104789] [12 Regression] New
 -Wstringop-overflow false positive since r12-5863-g9354a7d70caef1c9
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 12:05:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-104789-4-0t7B4mIlSF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-104789-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-104789-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 12:05:03 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104789

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to R=C3=A9mi Verschelde from comment #4)
> I'm not familiar with the term "bounded roo". I reduced the test case as
> much as I could to focus on the minimal code that would trigger the warni=
ng
> which seems to me like a false positive - is it not one?

roo was a typo for too. The r and t are next to each other on the standard
qwerty keyboard.

Anyways I think the warning should be reworded to say might be writing inst=
ead
of a definite. There is another bug talking about the wording too.

Also the way I read the code in both the original and reduced testcase, wit=
hout
knowing how components' range, there could be a buffer overflow.=