public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/104795] New: inconsistent wording in diagnostics
@ 2022-03-04 22:07 roland.illig at gmx dot de
2022-03-06 17:25 ` [Bug target/104795] " egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: roland.illig at gmx dot de @ 2022-03-04 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104795
Bug ID: 104795
Summary: inconsistent wording in diagnostics
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roland.illig at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
>From i386.c:
> %<-m96bit-long-double%> is not compatible with this target
> %<-mpreferred-stack-boundary%> is not supported for this target
Is there a semantic difference in the above messages? If not, please use the
same words for them. For the benefit of translators, please use the following
pattern, so that I as a translator don't have a chance of introducing
copy-and-paste mistakes:
error ("%qs is not supported for this target", "-m96bit-long-double");
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/104795] inconsistent wording in diagnostics
2022-03-04 22:07 [Bug target/104795] New: inconsistent wording in diagnostics roland.illig at gmx dot de
@ 2022-03-06 17:25 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-06 17:25 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-06 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104795
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The first message is now located in gcc/config/i386/i386-options.cc (git blame
says Uros wrote it in 716bb02b), and the second message only seems to exist in
pofiles now, so I dunno what happened to it...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/104795] inconsistent wording in diagnostics
2022-03-04 22:07 [Bug target/104795] New: inconsistent wording in diagnostics roland.illig at gmx dot de
2022-03-06 17:25 ` [Bug target/104795] " egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-03-06 17:25 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-07 10:40 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-07 10:41 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-06 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104795
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |easyhack
Severity|normal |trivial
Blocks| |40883
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
[Bug 40883] [meta-bug] Translation breakage with trivial fixes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/104795] inconsistent wording in diagnostics
2022-03-04 22:07 [Bug target/104795] New: inconsistent wording in diagnostics roland.illig at gmx dot de
2022-03-06 17:25 ` [Bug target/104795] " egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-06 17:25 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-03-07 10:40 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-07 10:41 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-07 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104795
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2022-03-07
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/104795] inconsistent wording in diagnostics
2022-03-04 22:07 [Bug target/104795] New: inconsistent wording in diagnostics roland.illig at gmx dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-03-07 10:40 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-03-07 10:41 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-07 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104795
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It's still there, but split across two lines:
../gcc/config/i386/i386-options.cc: error
("%<-mpreferred-stack-boundary%> is not supported "
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-03-07 10:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-03-04 22:07 [Bug target/104795] New: inconsistent wording in diagnostics roland.illig at gmx dot de
2022-03-06 17:25 ` [Bug target/104795] " egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-06 17:25 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-07 10:40 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-07 10:41 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).