From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 4D652385783B; Wed,  9 Mar 2022 15:55:31 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4D652385783B
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/104846] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected
 function_decl, have field_decl in grokmethod, at cp/decl.cc:17999
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 15:55:31 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-104846-4-WGEy9I5VYB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-104846-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-104846-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 15:55:31 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104846

--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> Confirmed.  Started with r10-2475-g777e426772f80c.  It would be trivial to
> bring back the grokmethod hunk to fix this ICE, but we should be more
> helpful and say that operator delete[] must return type void, which I thi=
nk
> [basic.stc.dynamic.deallocation]#3 says.

The return type is checked in coerce_delete_type but we never got there in =
this
test.=