From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 740E43858D20; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 23:33:22 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 740E43858D20 From: "kirshamir at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/104850] New: Instantiating a destructor for a template class too early, before the calling destructor is seen - rejects valid code Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 23:33:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: kirshamir at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 23:33:22 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104850 Bug ID: 104850 Summary: Instantiating a destructor for a template class too early, before the calling destructor is seen - rejects valid code Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: kirshamir at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- The following code is rejected as trying to use incomplete type, while when= the actual use would actually appear the type would be complete: template struct uptr { uptr(nullptr_t) {} ~uptr() { delete (new T); } }; class A { public: A(); ~A(); private: class B; uptr m_b =3D nullptr; // the dtor of uptr tries to be instantiated here }; If we change the initialization of: uptr m_b =3D nullptr;=20 To: uptr m_b {nullptr};=20 The destructor instantiation is delayed, till ~A() is seen, and the code ca= n be compiled. See: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71397495/why-does-default-member-initia= lizer-request-instantiation-of-unique-ptr-destru=