From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id BFEE7385801E; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:53:09 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BFEE7385801E
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/104931] [9/10/11 Regression] wrong-code with
 number_of_iterations_lt_to_ne
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:53:09 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-104931-4-xeOT5GZyR8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-104931-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-104931-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:53:09 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104931

--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 52646
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D52646&action=3Dedit
ivcanon dump from the GIMPLE testcase (without bug)

The difference is that with LTO we have expanded expressions to

Analyzing # of iterations of loop 1
  exit condition [(struct TValue *) (_2 + 4294967272) + 12, + ,
24](no_overflow) < _2 + 4294967272

while with the GIMPLE testcase we immediately get to

Statement (exit)if (from_26 < to_27)
 is executed at most 0 (bounded by 0) + 1 times in loop 1.
...
Loop 1 iterates 0 times.


Note the GIMPLE FE doesn't yet support parsing CLOBBER stmts (but I'm quite
sure this doesn't matter here) and for the loops() support you need to
commit a pending patch.=