public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bero at lindev dot ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/105009] New: [12 Regression] Fails to build with --target=xtensa-esp32-elf
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 02:12:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-105009-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105009

            Bug ID: 105009
           Summary: [12 Regression] Fails to build with
                    --target=xtensa-esp32-elf
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: bero at lindev dot ch
  Target Milestone: ---

Trying to build gcc 12 (snapshot 20220313) with --target=xtensa-esp32-elf fails
because tree_to_poly_int64, tree_to_poly_uint64, tree_to_shwi and tree_to_uhwi
are implemented in both gcc/tree.h and gcc/tree.cc:

../../gcc/tree.cc:3222:1: error: redefinition of a 'extern inline' function
'tree_to_poly_int64' is not supported in C++
tree_to_poly_int64 (const_tree t)
^
../../gcc/tree.h:4691:1: note: previous definition is here
tree_to_poly_int64 (const_tree t)
^
../../gcc/tree.cc:3231:1: error: redefinition of a 'extern inline' function
'tree_to_poly_uint64' is not supported in C++
tree_to_poly_uint64 (const_tree t)
^
../../gcc/tree.h:4698:1: note: previous definition is here
tree_to_poly_uint64 (const_tree t)
^
../../gcc/tree.cc:6350:1: error: redefinition of a 'extern inline' function
'tree_to_shwi' is not supported in C++
tree_to_shwi (const_tree t)
^
../../gcc/tree.h:4677:1: note: previous definition is here
tree_to_shwi (const_tree t)
^
../../gcc/tree.cc:6361:1: error: redefinition of a 'extern inline' function
'tree_to_uhwi' is not supported in C++
tree_to_uhwi (const_tree t)
^
../../gcc/tree.h:4684:1: note: previous definition is here
tree_to_uhwi (const_tree t)
^


Simply commenting out/removing the extra definitions in gcc/tree.h seems to be
sufficient to fix the problem.

             reply	other threads:[~2022-03-22  2:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-22  2:12 bero at lindev dot ch [this message]
2022-03-22  8:44 ` [Bug middle-end/105009] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-22 17:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-23  8:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-105009-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).