public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/105010] [12/13 regression] GCC 12 after 20220227 fails to build on powerpc64-freebsd with Error: invalid mfcr mask
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2023 23:24:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-105010-4-t9NFPd7ApM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-105010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105010
--- Comment #20 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #18)
> But! We do not support 2.00 at all since quite a while (-mcpu=power4
> does not mean 2.00, it means 2.02, i.e. POWER4+ actually), so this macro
> could
> be a lot simpler.
It means 2.01, sorry. Nasty typo :-(
So, although we get .machine "7450" in the generated assembler code, the
compiler uses the default -mcpu=power4 otherwise. Some logic there is
broken.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-03 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-22 2:50 [Bug bootstrap/105010] New: GCC 12 after 20220227 fails " pkubaj at anongoth dot pl
2022-03-22 8:45 ` [Bug bootstrap/105010] GCC 12 after 20220227 fails to build " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-22 8:47 ` pkubaj at anongoth dot pl
2022-03-22 10:34 ` [Bug target/105010] [12 regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-22 20:57 ` pkubaj at anongoth dot pl
2022-03-22 22:50 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-22 23:00 ` pkubaj at anongoth dot pl
2022-03-23 11:34 ` pkubaj at anongoth dot pl
2022-03-23 12:41 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-23 14:54 ` pkubaj at anongoth dot pl
2022-03-23 17:33 ` pkubaj at anongoth dot pl
2022-03-23 18:56 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-23 21:26 ` pkubaj at anongoth dot pl
2022-03-23 22:33 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-23 23:26 ` pkubaj at anongoth dot pl
2022-04-04 13:05 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-06 21:28 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-06 8:33 ` [Bug target/105010] [12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-31 4:26 ` pkubaj at anongoth dot pl
2022-12-31 18:24 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-01 13:26 ` pkubaj at anongoth dot pl
2023-01-03 23:24 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-01-05 14:04 ` pkubaj at anongoth dot pl
2023-01-05 15:03 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-13 22:39 ` pkubaj at anongoth dot pl
2023-05-08 12:24 ` [Bug target/105010] [12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-105010-4-t9NFPd7ApM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).