From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0200F385F015; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 20:40:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0200F385F015
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1661460050;
	bh=DydwKmFC0U5jcdlLZWUdkgR/EG+GP2WBzqfFWOGahiM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=QKMrbmE7BVs/GpGRnYLO7kt6G4jy0tJT2b7saO6IaDVx1VdVqVkCKGzN81cKNpOTf
	 lME7+uhcrFcNocHFLbWXjtgR9bKuFn8UnorUqA2GallI9nPEu6uTF7z2yWutQ8Pfg7
	 oKUfzH/pLJ31WqHvg1iXG8mzB8gX5CLeuGZ2MFh8=
From: "mikael at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/105012] [12/13 Regression] wrf from SPECCPU2017 ICEs
 during LTO linking since r12-7692-g8db155ddf8cec9
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 20:40:49 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105012-4-M7btX86MjX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105012-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105012-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105012

--- Comment #26 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #25)
> (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #24)
> > (In reply to anlauf from comment #22)
> > >=20
> > > The remaining problem from PR41453#c8 is the following code in trans-=
expr.cc:
> > >=20
> > > (gdb) l 9539,9548
> > > 9539          else if (add_clobber && expr->ref =3D=3D NULL)
> > > 9540            {
> > > 9541              tree clobber;
> > > 9542              tree var;
> > > 9543              /* FIXME: This fails if var is passed by reference,=
 see PR
> > > 9544                 41453.  */
> > > 9545              var =3D expr->symtree->n.sym->backend_decl;
> > > 9546              clobber =3D build_clobber (TREE_TYPE (var));
> > > 9547              gfc_add_modify (&se->pre, var, clobber);
> > > 9548            }
> > >=20
> > > One needs to understand how to fix up 'var' here for the case at hand.
> > >=20
> > I guess the obvious one (se->expr) doesn=E2=80=99t work?
>=20
> Could you explain how to use it?  (I don't have the necessary vision.)

Upon return from gfc_conv_expr, se->expr holds the value of the expression.
So basically var =3D se->expr;
As we manage to pass __result_derfc as argument, then I expect se->expr to =
have
value __result_derfc at that point.=