From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 93BE7385E45C; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:18:00 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 93BE7385E45C
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/105012] [12 Regression] wrf from SPECCPU2017 ICEs
 during LTO linking since r12-7692-g8db155ddf8cec9
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:18:00 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords
Message-ID: <bug-105012-4-ZjLb6W1kIZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105012-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105012-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:18:00 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105012

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code

--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
likely triggered by the INTENT(out), it looks like gfortran fails to proper=
ly
name-lookup a variable of the same name as the function?  The intent is lik=
ely
to have the return value assigned by CALERF_r8.  So it also looks like gfor=
tran
miscompiles such testcase.

The following sketches a miscompiled testcase (but my fortran fu is too wea=
k to
make it compile)

PROCEDURE Y (Z)
      real(8), intent(out) :: Z
      Z =3D 1.
END PROCEDURE Y
FUNCTION X
      real(8) :: X
      CALL Y (X)
END FUNCTION X
PROGRAM TEST
    real(8) :: Z
    Z =3D X();
    if (Z.ne.1.) STOP 1
END=