From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id BA01B3858419; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 10:27:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BA01B3858419
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1661682445;
	bh=tyF5xsuR3h87lYJYnOBx+b7+kn0b+Rs1OmIRBIyFkAw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Llto9aXfaOoIY7yaMLlUxmZEcMerugl1PhcnK9mALN2qBel0QCHSq6toSyt+dWDZD
	 tibEbyXuWZiQm9KnwxSENmGmxz8iiTdsrBthuQEZsuX+RCY2Gq2gdyETFRzEz2A9Xq
	 G9+ioG4INo3BkhDRqDNAxd/vYS918OO1/9qQrit8=
From: "mikael at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/105012] [12/13 Regression] wrf from SPECCPU2017 ICEs
 during LTO linking since r12-7692-g8db155ddf8cec9
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 10:27:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-105012-4-kcSsKPpfow@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105012-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105012-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105012

Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |mikael at gcc dot g=
nu.org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #30 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #29)
>=20
> but if your patch regtests fine then you should proceed.

Ok, let=E2=80=99s see how good it is.
Assigning.=