From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 281DC3858C56; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 02:49:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 281DC3858C56
From: "wwwhhhyyy333 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/105034] [10/11/12 regression]Suboptimal codegen for
 min/max with -Os
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 02:49:26 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: wwwhhhyyy333 at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105034-4-kG65kRR8w3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105034-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105034-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 02:49:26 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105034

--- Comment #2 from Hongyu Wang <wwwhhhyyy333 at gmail dot com> ---
For -O2 stv doesn't do such transform
Computing gain for chain #1...
  Instruction gain 8 for     7: {r84:SI=3Dsmax(r85:SI,0);clobber flags:CC;}
      REG_DEAD r85:SI
      REG_UNUSED flags:CC
  Instruction conversion gain: 8
  Registers conversion cost: 12
  Total gain: -4

Since sse->integer reg move cost is 6 for generic cost.

Buf for -Os the cost is 3 so it is consider to be profitable.
Computing gain for chain #1...
  Instruction gain 8 for     7: {r84:SI=3Dsmax(r85:SI,0);clobber flags:CC;}
      REG_DEAD r85:SI
      REG_UNUSED flags:CC
  Instruction conversion gain: 8
  Registers conversion cost: 6
  Total gain: 2

FWIW, the solution would be either adjust the ix86_size cost, or blocks out=
=20
optimize_size in the stv gate.=