From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id DA3913858C74; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 09:50:47 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DA3913858C74 From: "tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/105075] [nvptx] Generate sad insn (sum of absolute differences) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 09:50:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 09:50:48 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105075 Thomas Schwinge changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org, | |tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.o= rg Last reconfirmed| |2022-03-28 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0) > ptx has sad ((sum of absolute differences)) insn, which is currently not > modeled in the .md file. I also had noticed this, a while ago (but no opportunity to work on it properly). I had found GCC/RTL 'ssad', 'usad', and 'gcc/tree.def:SAD_EXPR', but not verified their applicability. (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #2) > AFAIU, at gimple level support is limited to vectors, so that doesn't help > to generate the insn for the simple, scalar case. >=20 > It would be nice if combine could generate it and we wouldn't have to use= a > peephole, but AFAIU the pattern is too complex for that. >=20 > I wonder if reformulating using a conditional could help there (ptx isa > describes semantics using "c + ((a Also, I wonder if defining a stepping-stone intermediate pattern could he= lp > combine.=