From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 747593858413; Sat, 2 Apr 2022 13:55:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 747593858413 From: "andre.schackier at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/105136] New: [11/12] Missed optimization regression with 32-bit adds and shifts Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2022 13:55:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: andre.schackier at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2022 13:55:30 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105136 Bug ID: 105136 Summary: [11/12] Missed optimization regression with 32-bit adds and shifts Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: andre.schackier at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Given the following source code [godbolt](https://godbolt.org/z/daTxMYWKo) #include int32_t foo(int64_t a, int32_t b, int cond) { if (cond) { a +=3D ((int64_t)b) << 32; } return a >> 32; } int32_t bar(int64_t a, int32_t b, int cond) { int32_t r =3D a >> 32; if (cond) { r +=3D b; } return r; } and compiling with "-O3" we get the following assembly: foo: sal rsi, 32 mov rax, rdi add rax, rsi test edx, edx cmove rax, rdi shr rax, 32 ret bar: sar rdi, 32 add esi, edi test edx, edx mov eax, esi cmove eax, edi ret With gcc-10.3 we get for bar: bar: sar rdi, 32 test edx, edx lea eax, [rsi+rdi] cmove eax, edi ret Also note that neither versions recognize that foo does the same as bar. Credits: This was entirely found by Trevor Spiteri reported at the llvm-pro= ject here: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54718=