From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C37A7385B187; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 20:03:30 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C37A7385B187
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1669665810;
	bh=9vA3E6VcawZA4nEzHOwTo6aZe0a4fuWy3UlLjDNWQyE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=HTStiUDV4jKh64L9doiMmCKhmexKaaOV8nXB/gMeOyhhpSVbRE+U3sFSRLCDybRbc
	 ZH/75E5F4N/aZ9Xma6bgZMUXjiVgdp5voi0MzLQfRnb+flD2oXSxFOzFHW03L4LNli
	 MEhxhXeIlUu0sn9oTPUVvZ/H+Zz98yQd2ve7D+v0=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/105137] Missed optimization 64-bit adds and shifts
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 20:03:30 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget everconfirmed bug_status bug_severity
 cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-105137-4-MnXxUM4haR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105137-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105137-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105137

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Target|                            |x86_64-linux-gnu
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-11-28

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed. Interesting aarch64 is able to optimize it all the way to be the
same code for both of them (well the only difference is the first add has t=
he
operands swapped but still is the same really).=