public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/105149] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211
@ 2022-04-04 16:42 gscfq@t-online.de
2022-04-04 17:11 ` [Bug tree-optimization/105149] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 more replies)
0 siblings, 13 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: gscfq@t-online.de @ 2022-04-04 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
Bug ID: 105149
Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at
tree-ssa.cc:1211
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gscfq@t-online.de
Target Milestone: ---
Affects versions down to r6, at -O1+ :
(gcc configured with --enable-checking=yes)
$ cat z1.c
#include <stdarg.h>
void foo (int size, ...)
{
struct {} d;
va_list ap;
d = va_arg (ap, typeof(d)()) ();
}
$ gcc-5 -c z1.c -O2
$ gcc-12-20220403 -c z1.c
$
$ gcc-12-20220403 -c z1.c -O2
z1.c: In function 'foo':
z1.c:7:1: error: virtual definition of statement not up to date
7 | }
| ^
D.1987 = _1;
during GIMPLE pass: ssa
z1.c:7:1: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
0x10a33db verify_ssa(bool, bool)
../../gcc/tree-ssa.cc:1211
0xd01ea7 execute_function_todo
../../gcc/passes.cc:2092
0xd027f2 execute_todo
../../gcc/passes.cc:2139
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/105149] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211
2022-04-04 16:42 [Bug c/105149] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211 gscfq@t-online.de
@ 2022-04-04 17:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-05 6:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-04 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed| |2022-04-04
Component|c |tree-optimization
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r6-91-gf8e89441bc5518f450b6511c59c17c837859d109
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/105149] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211
2022-04-04 16:42 [Bug c/105149] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211 gscfq@t-online.de
2022-04-04 17:11 ` [Bug tree-optimization/105149] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-05 6:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-05 7:34 ` [Bug c/105149] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-05 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I will have a look.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/105149] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211
2022-04-04 16:42 [Bug c/105149] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211 gscfq@t-online.de
2022-04-04 17:11 ` [Bug tree-optimization/105149] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-05 6:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-05 7:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-05 7:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-05 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|tree-optimization |c
CC| |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywords| |accepts-invalid,
| |ice-on-invalid-code
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The odd thing is that we parse
d = va_arg (ap, typeof(d)()) ();
as function call, gimplifying it as
_1 = .VA_ARG (&ap(address-taken), 0B, 0B);
D.1987(address-taken) = _1;
D.1987(address-taken) ();
<modify_expr 0x7ffff6650d70
type <record_type 0x7ffff66793f0 type_0 BLK
size <integer_cst 0x7ffff6517dc8 constant 0>
unit-size <integer_cst 0x7ffff6517d80 constant 0>
align:8 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type
0x7ffff66793f0 context <function_decl 0x7ffff6656200 foo>
chain <type_decl 0x7ffff65415f0 D.1983>>
side-effects
arg:0 <var_decl 0x7ffff6526bd0 d type <record_type 0x7ffff66793f0>
used read BLK t.c:4:13 size <integer_cst 0x7ffff6517dc8 0> unit-size
<integer_cst 0x7ffff6517d80 0>
align:8 warn_if_not_align:0 context <function_decl 0x7ffff6656200 foo>
chain <var_decl 0x7ffff6526c60 ap type <array_type 0x7ffff66792a0
va_list>
addressable used read BLK t.c:5:11
size <integer_cst 0x7ffff6537210 constant 192>
unit-size <integer_cst 0x7ffff65371e0 constant 24>
align:64 warn_if_not_align:0 context <function_decl 0x7ffff6656200
foo>>>
arg:1 <call_expr 0x7ffff66786c0 type <record_type 0x7ffff66793f0>
side-effects
fn <addr_expr 0x7ffff66652a0 type <pointer_type 0x7ffff6679540>
side-effects
arg:0 <va_arg_expr 0x7ffff6665280 type <function_type
0x7ffff6679498>
side-effects
arg:0 <addr_expr 0x7ffff6665260 type <pointer_type
0x7ffff6542b28>
arg:0 <var_decl 0x7ffff6526c60 ap>>
t.c:6:7 start: t.c:6:7 finish: t.c:6:7>
t.c:6:7 start: t.c:6:7 finish: t.c:6:7>
t.c:6:7 start: t.c:6:7 finish: t.c:6:33>
t.c:6:5 start: t.c:6:3 finish: t.c:6:33>
I _think_ we fail to decay the function type in va_arg to a pointer type
or we fail to reject this testcase.
Somewhat reduced testcase:
#include <stdarg.h>
typedef struct {} D;
void foo (int size, ...)
{
va_list ap;
va_arg (ap, D()) ();
}
C17/7.16.1.1 isn't sufficiently clear as to whether this is valid, but
at least "The parameter type shall be a type name specified such that
the type of a pointer to an object that has the specified type can be
obtained simply by postfixing a * to type" isn't fulfilled here since
the corresponding pointer type would be D(*)(), not D()*.
clang rejects this with
t.c:6:15: error: second argument to 'va_arg' is of non-POD type 'D ()'
[-Wnon-pod-varargs]
va_arg (ap, D()) ();
^~~
but not sure if "POD" is a thing to use in C language diagnostics.
Anyway, defering to C frontend maintainers.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/105149] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211
2022-04-04 16:42 [Bug c/105149] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211 gscfq@t-online.de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-05 7:34 ` [Bug c/105149] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-05 7:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-05 7:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-05 7:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It looks like c_build_va_arg could be amended to reject FUNCTION_TYPE type.
But as said, not sure if this is valid or not.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/105149] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211
2022-04-04 16:42 [Bug c/105149] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211 gscfq@t-online.de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-05 7:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-05 7:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-05 7:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-05 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The C++ frontend accepts this and diagnoses
In file included from t.c:1:
t.c: In function 'void foo(int, ...)':
t.c:6:15: warning: 'D()' is promoted to 'D (*)()' when passed through '...'
6 | va_arg (ap, D()) ();
and produces the following GENERIC, decaying the "loaded function":
<call_expr 0x7ffff6692c00
type <record_type 0x7ffff6681348 D cxx-odr-p type_5 QI
size <integer_cst 0x7ffff653a048 constant 8>
unit-size <integer_cst 0x7ffff653a060 constant 1>
align:8 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type
0x7ffff6681348
fields <function_decl 0x7ffff6685600 __dt type <method_type
0x7ffff6698000>
public abstract external autoinline decl_3 QI t.c:2:19 align:16
warn_if_not_align:0 context <record_type 0x7ffff6681348 D>
full-name "D::~D() noexcept (<uninstantiated>)"
not-really-extern chain <function_decl 0x7ffff6685800 __dt_base >>
context <translation_unit_decl 0x7ffff6525168 t.c>
full-name "struct D"
X() X(constX&) this=(X&) n_parents=0 use_template=0 interface-unknown
pointer_to_this <pointer_type 0x7ffff66817e0> chain <type_decl
0x7ffff6547980 ._anon_0>>
side-effects
fn <addr_expr 0x7ffff6678980
type <pointer_type 0x7ffff6681690 type <function_type 0x7ffff66815e8>
unsigned DI
size <integer_cst 0x7ffff6517f48 constant 64>
unit-size <integer_cst 0x7ffff6517f60 constant 8>
align:64 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type
0x7ffff6681690>
side-effects
arg:0 <va_arg_expr 0x7ffff6678960 type <function_type 0x7ffff66815e8>
side-effects
arg:0 <addr_expr 0x7ffff6678a00 type <pointer_type 0x7ffff6544dc8>
arg:0 <var_decl 0x7ffff6526c60 ap>>
t.c:6:3 start: t.c:6:3 finish: t.c:6:3>
t.c:6:3 start: t.c:6:3 finish: t.c:6:3>
t.c:6:3 start: t.c:6:3 finish: t.c:6:3>
which we then gimplify to
__builtin_trap ();
<<< Unknown tree: integer_cst >>> ();
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/105149] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211
2022-04-04 16:42 [Bug c/105149] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211 gscfq@t-online.de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-05 7:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-05 7:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-05 18:42 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-05 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> The C++ frontend accepts this and diagnoses
>
> In file included from t.c:1:
> t.c: In function 'void foo(int, ...)':
> t.c:6:15: warning: 'D()' is promoted to 'D (*)()' when passed through '...'
> 6 | va_arg (ap, D()) ();
>
> and produces the following GENERIC, decaying the "loaded function":
include/stdarg.h:49:44: note: in definition of macro 'va_arg'
49 | #define va_arg(v,l) __builtin_va_arg(v,l)
| ^
t.c:6:15: note: (so you should pass 'D (*)()' not 'D()' to 'va_arg')
6 | va_arg (ap, D()) ();
include/stdarg.h:49:44: note: in definition of macro 'va_arg'
49 | #define va_arg(v,l) __builtin_va_arg(v,l)
| ^
t.c:6:15: note: if this code is reached, the program will abort
6 | va_arg (ap, D()) ();
include/stdarg.h:49:44: note: in definition of macro 'va_arg'
49 | #define va_arg(v,l) __builtin_va_arg(v,l)
| ^
because the C++ implementation of lang_hooks.types.type_promotes_to
says the function type doesn't promote to itself. The C frontend
seems to lack that.
>
>
> <call_expr 0x7ffff6692c00
> type <record_type 0x7ffff6681348 D cxx-odr-p type_5 QI
> size <integer_cst 0x7ffff653a048 constant 8>
> unit-size <integer_cst 0x7ffff653a060 constant 1>
> align:8 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type
> 0x7ffff6681348
> fields <function_decl 0x7ffff6685600 __dt type <method_type
> 0x7ffff6698000>
> public abstract external autoinline decl_3 QI t.c:2:19 align:16
> warn_if_not_align:0 context <record_type 0x7ffff6681348 D>
> full-name "D::~D() noexcept (<uninstantiated>)"
> not-really-extern chain <function_decl 0x7ffff6685800 __dt_base
> >> context <translation_unit_decl 0x7ffff6525168 t.c>
> full-name "struct D"
> X() X(constX&) this=(X&) n_parents=0 use_template=0 interface-unknown
> pointer_to_this <pointer_type 0x7ffff66817e0> chain <type_decl
> 0x7ffff6547980 ._anon_0>>
> side-effects
> fn <addr_expr 0x7ffff6678980
> type <pointer_type 0x7ffff6681690 type <function_type 0x7ffff66815e8>
> unsigned DI
> size <integer_cst 0x7ffff6517f48 constant 64>
> unit-size <integer_cst 0x7ffff6517f60 constant 8>
> align:64 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1
> canonical-type 0x7ffff6681690>
> side-effects
> arg:0 <va_arg_expr 0x7ffff6678960 type <function_type 0x7ffff66815e8>
> side-effects
> arg:0 <addr_expr 0x7ffff6678a00 type <pointer_type
> 0x7ffff6544dc8>
> arg:0 <var_decl 0x7ffff6526c60 ap>>
> t.c:6:3 start: t.c:6:3 finish: t.c:6:3>
> t.c:6:3 start: t.c:6:3 finish: t.c:6:3>
> t.c:6:3 start: t.c:6:3 finish: t.c:6:3>
>
> which we then gimplify to
>
> __builtin_trap ();
> <<< Unknown tree: integer_cst >>> ();
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/105149] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211
2022-04-04 16:42 [Bug c/105149] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211 gscfq@t-online.de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-05 7:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-05 18:42 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2022-04-07 10:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: joseph at codesourcery dot com @ 2022-04-05 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> ---
I think it's valid to reject this at compile time (rather than just
generating a runtime trap): the "such that the type of a pointer to an
object that has the specified type can be obtained simply by postfixing a
* to type" can never be satisfied for a function type, even if e.g. a
typedef name is used so that postfixing '*' produces valid syntax for the
corresponding pointer type, because it still wouldn't be "the type of a
pointer to an object".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/105149] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211
2022-04-04 16:42 [Bug c/105149] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211 gscfq@t-online.de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-05 18:42 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
@ 2022-04-07 10:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-08 7:17 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-07 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 52767
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52767&action=edit
gcc12-pr105149.patch
Untested patch to reject it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/105149] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211
2022-04-04 16:42 [Bug c/105149] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211 gscfq@t-online.de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-07 10:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-08 7:17 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-08 8:11 ` [Bug c/105149] [9/10/11 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-08 7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e2743687202c58a6553ae632ebbada3de38ad48
commit r12-8057-g6e2743687202c58a6553ae632ebbada3de38ad48
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Apr 8 09:16:30 2022 +0200
c: Error on va_arg with function type [PR105149]
In the PR Joseph said that the C standard for va_arg talks about
pointers to object type and as a function type is not object type,
it is invalid.
The following patch diagnoses it in the FE, instead of ICEing later on
when optimizations are turned on (and with -O0 doing something weird
at runtime).
2022-04-08 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c/105149
* c-typeck.cc (c_build_va_arg): Reject function types.
* gcc.dg/pr105149.c: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/105149] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211
2022-04-04 16:42 [Bug c/105149] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211 gscfq@t-online.de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-08 7:17 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-08 8:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:47 ` [Bug c/105149] [10/11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-08 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in
|in verify_ssa, at |verify_ssa, at
|tree-ssa.cc:1211 |tree-ssa.cc:1211
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on the trunk. Unsure about backports though, if we do something for
those, might be better to silently turn it into __builtin_trap() than to reject
it when it wasn't rejected before.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/105149] [10/11 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211
2022-04-04 16:42 [Bug c/105149] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211 gscfq@t-online.de
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-08 8:11 ` [Bug c/105149] [9/10/11 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27 9:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:42 ` [Bug c/105149] [11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/105149] [10/11 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211
2022-04-04 16:42 [Bug c/105149] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211 gscfq@t-online.de
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-27 9:47 ` [Bug c/105149] [10/11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:42 ` [Bug c/105149] [11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/105149] [11 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211
2022-04-04 16:42 [Bug c/105149] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211 gscfq@t-online.de
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 10:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.5 |11.5
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-07 10:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-04 16:42 [Bug c/105149] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.cc:1211 gscfq@t-online.de
2022-04-04 17:11 ` [Bug tree-optimization/105149] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-05 6:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-05 7:34 ` [Bug c/105149] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-05 7:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-05 7:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-05 7:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-05 18:42 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2022-04-07 10:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-08 7:17 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-08 8:11 ` [Bug c/105149] [9/10/11 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:47 ` [Bug c/105149] [10/11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:42 ` [Bug c/105149] [11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).