From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 28CFD3858C52; Tue,  5 Apr 2022 07:16:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 28CFD3858C52
From: "aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/105151] [12 Regression] ICE in gimple_range_global with
 invalid "gimple" language
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 07:16:58 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105151-4-dMOnppwvVw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105151-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105151-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 07:16:58 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105151

--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> going down passes after errors is always tricky - we do stop but it seems
> the diagnostic passes are still run because they are part of "lowering"
> (why is pass_walloca not in pass_build_ssa_passes like
> pass_warn_{printf,nonnull_compare,access}?).  In particular it seems to l=
ook
> at ranger but we are not even in SSA form!?

Yeah, that looks like an oversight.

>=20
> ranger "support" was added with r12-1078-gfe9a499cb8775c which should have
> moved the pass to a place where we are in SSA form or the ranger use
> restricted to the late pass.
>=20
> I'm testing moving of the pass.

Thanks.=