From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 3B7803858427; Wed,  6 Apr 2022 11:35:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3B7803858427
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/105169] Compiling C++ code with
 -fpatchable-function-entry=16,14 results in references to discarded sections
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2022 11:35:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: link-failure
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105169-4-z6teCP6olI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105169-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105169-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2022 11:35:25 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105169

--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105169
>=20
> --- Comment #5 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> It's there since the introduction of the option in r8-2176-g417ca0117a1a9=
a8a.

Yes, I think it's a fundamental limitation of how we emit refereces into
the section if the defs are inside comdats - the refs are locally
resolved instead of being symbolic.  But IMHO somehow amending the
patchable functions list from inside the comdat group itself would
be preferable.=