From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 8FA553830B0D; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 06:48:23 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8FA553830B0D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1668494903;
	bh=DKJ8jQNzdg/rHUseWauyKePAsXA0KQJPftnHxvmXjZk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ZRBnvljnRl0BvBGbY4B4m6rZjCC8hi2KKvE4J3b9Zv8iR1cxsRAFztjzG1V8reDsd
	 tSVY8QAY8dGvjFSLUe30dgJio+eBWDYOVnUicnftadYnK1QbIIbIiGaeTSRoEknzVE
	 WrorBuq8lkXQBxKN3EHWhfQkjAZOr37zCGyKRUPs=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/105180] [10/11/12/13 Regression] K&R style definition does
 not evaluate array size
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 06:48:23 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-bisection, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105180-4-FgaMbTPFmM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105180-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105180-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105180

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> I am suspecting r0-108564-ga04a722b88baf5 .

That is https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg00319.html .

I suspect there was a missing old style part to the parser but I am not 100%
sure.=