* [Bug debug/105203] [11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC since r11-3078-g69ca5f3a988266da
2022-04-08 9:59 [Bug debug/105203] New: '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC asolokha at gmx dot com
@ 2022-04-08 12:04 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-08 15:25 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-08 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105203
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2022-04-08
Summary|'-fcompare-debug' failure |[11/12 Regression]
|w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC |'-fcompare-debug' failure
| |w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC since
| |r11-3078-g69ca5f3a988266da
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r11-3078-g69ca5f3a988266da.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/105203] [11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC since r11-3078-g69ca5f3a988266da
2022-04-08 9:59 [Bug debug/105203] New: '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC asolokha at gmx dot com
2022-04-08 12:04 ` [Bug debug/105203] [11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC since r11-3078-g69ca5f3a988266da marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-08 15:25 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-08 15:44 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: segher at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-08 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105203
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I cannot reproduce this problem, what other flags does it need to reproduce?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/105203] [11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC since r11-3078-g69ca5f3a988266da
2022-04-08 9:59 [Bug debug/105203] New: '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC asolokha at gmx dot com
2022-04-08 12:04 ` [Bug debug/105203] [11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC since r11-3078-g69ca5f3a988266da marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-08 15:25 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-08 15:44 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-08 16:05 ` asolokha at gmx dot com
` (9 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: segher at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-08 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105203
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Lol, this isn't a PowerPC issue at all. Please fill out the target field?
How can there be a difference in the number of uses only (and no difference
in actual uses!)?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/105203] [11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC since r11-3078-g69ca5f3a988266da
2022-04-08 9:59 [Bug debug/105203] New: '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC asolokha at gmx dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-08 15:44 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-08 16:05 ` asolokha at gmx dot com
2022-04-08 16:20 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: asolokha at gmx dot com @ 2022-04-08 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105203
--- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha <asolokha at gmx dot com> ---
It is not target-dependent and, besides x86_64, can be reproduced at least at
powerpc and aarch64 as well.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/105203] [11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC since r11-3078-g69ca5f3a988266da
2022-04-08 9:59 [Bug debug/105203] New: '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC asolokha at gmx dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-08 16:05 ` asolokha at gmx dot com
@ 2022-04-08 16:20 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-11 7:46 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/105203] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: segher at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-08 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105203
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It does not show up with any configuration I have tried, so clearly it needs
something more :-(
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/105203] [11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC since r11-3078-g69ca5f3a988266da
2022-04-08 9:59 [Bug debug/105203] New: '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC asolokha at gmx dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-08 16:20 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-11 7:46 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-20 8:36 ` [Bug debug/105203] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-11 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105203
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
@Segher: Have you tried running it on x86_64-linux-gnu?
gcc -O2 -fcompare-debug -ftracer -fPIC -w -c
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77/pr9258.f --save-temps --verbose
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none:amdgcn-amdhsa
OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1
Target: x86_64-suse-linux
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --infodir=/usr/share/info
--mandir=/usr/share/man --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/lib64
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,ada,go,d,jit
--enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none,amdgcn-amdhsa, --without-cuda-driver
--enable-host-shared --enable-checking=release --disable-werror
--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/11 --enable-ssp --disable-libssp
--disable-libvtv --enable-cet=auto --disable-libcc1 --enable-plugin
--with-bugurl=https://bugs.opensuse.org/ --with-pkgversion='SUSE Linux'
--with-slibdir=/lib64 --with-system-zlib --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new
--disable-libstdcxx-pch --enable-libphobos
--enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --with-gcc-major-version-only
--enable-linker-build-id --enable-linux-futex --enable-gnu-indirect-function
--program-suffix=-11 --without-system-libunwind --enable-multilib
--with-arch-32=x86-64 --with-tune=generic
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --enable-link-mutex
--build=x86_64-suse-linux --host=x86_64-suse-linux
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 11.2.1 20220316 [revision 6a1150d1524aeda3381b2171712e1a6611d441d6]
(SUSE Linux)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-O2' '-fcompare-debug=-gtoggle' '-ftracer' '-fPIC' '-w'
'-c' '-save-temps' '-v' '-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64'
/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/11/f951
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77/pr9258.f -ffixed-form -quiet -dumpbase pr9258.f
-dumpbase-ext .f -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -O2 -w -version
-fcompare-debug=-gtoggle -ftracer -fPIC -fintrinsic-modules-path
/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/11/finclude
-fpre-include=/usr/include/finclude/math-vector-fortran.h
-frandom-seed=0x56af55577b39fac1 -fdump-final-insns=pr9258.f.gkd -o pr9258.s
GNU Fortran (SUSE Linux) version 11.2.1 20220316 [revision
6a1150d1524aeda3381b2171712e1a6611d441d6] (x86_64-suse-linux)
compiled by GNU C version 11.2.1 20220316 [revision
6a1150d1524aeda3381b2171712e1a6611d441d6], GMP version 6.2.1, MPFR version
4.1.0-p7, MPC version 1.2.1, isl version isl-0.24-GMP
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
GNU Fortran2008 (SUSE Linux) version 11.2.1 20220316 [revision
6a1150d1524aeda3381b2171712e1a6611d441d6] (x86_64-suse-linux)
compiled by GNU C version 11.2.1 20220316 [revision
6a1150d1524aeda3381b2171712e1a6611d441d6], GMP version 6.2.1, MPFR version
4.1.0-p7, MPC version 1.2.1, isl version isl-0.24-GMP
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-O2' '-fcompare-debug=-gtoggle' '-ftracer' '-fPIC' '-w'
'-c' '-save-temps' '-v' '-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64'
/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/11/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/as -v -W
--64 -o pr9258.o pr9258.s
GNU assembler version 2.38 (x86_64-suse-linux) using BFD version (GNU Binutils;
openSUSE Tumbleweed) 2.38.20220304-3
gcc: note: recompiling with ‘-fcompare-debug’
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-O2' '-fcompare-debug=-gtoggle' '-ftracer' '-fPIC' '-w'
'-c' '-save-temps' '-v' '-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64' '-w' '-S' '-o'
'/dev/null' '-fcompare-debug-second' '-gtoggle'
/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/11/f951
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77/pr9258.f -ffixed-form -quiet -dumpbase
pr9258.gk.f -dumpbase-ext .f -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -gtoggle -O2 -w -w
-version -fcompare-debug=-gtoggle -ftracer -fPIC -fcompare-debug-second -o
/dev/null -fintrinsic-modules-path /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/11/finclude
-fpre-include=/usr/include/finclude/math-vector-fortran.h
-frandom-seed=0x56af55577b39fac1 -fdump-final-insns=pr9258.gk.f.gkd
GNU Fortran (SUSE Linux) version 11.2.1 20220316 [revision
6a1150d1524aeda3381b2171712e1a6611d441d6] (x86_64-suse-linux)
compiled by GNU C version 11.2.1 20220316 [revision
6a1150d1524aeda3381b2171712e1a6611d441d6], GMP version 6.2.1, MPFR version
4.1.0-p7, MPC version 1.2.1, isl version isl-0.24-GMP
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
GNU Fortran2008 (SUSE Linux) version 11.2.1 20220316 [revision
6a1150d1524aeda3381b2171712e1a6611d441d6] (x86_64-suse-linux)
compiled by GNU C version 11.2.1 20220316 [revision
6a1150d1524aeda3381b2171712e1a6611d441d6], GMP version 6.2.1, MPFR version
4.1.0-p7, MPC version 1.2.1, isl version isl-0.24-GMP
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
gcc: note: comparing final insns dumps
gcc: error: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77/pr9258.f: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/105203] [11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC since r11-3078-g69ca5f3a988266da
2022-04-08 9:59 [Bug debug/105203] New: '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC asolokha at gmx dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-11 7:46 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/105203] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-20 8:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-20 13:31 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-20 8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105203
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 52837
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52837&action=edit
gcc12-pr105203.patch
Untested fix.
Other callers of mark_jump_label like mark_all_labels only call it on non-debug
insns, but this function calls it even for those.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/105203] [11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC since r11-3078-g69ca5f3a988266da
2022-04-08 9:59 [Bug debug/105203] New: '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC asolokha at gmx dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-20 8:36 ` [Bug debug/105203] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-20 13:31 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-21 7:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: segher at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-20 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105203
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> @Segher: Have you tried running it on x86_64-linux-gnu?
No, only with crosscompilers. This PR does not say it needs native.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/105203] [11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC since r11-3078-g69ca5f3a988266da
2022-04-08 9:59 [Bug debug/105203] New: '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC asolokha at gmx dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-20 13:31 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-21 7:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-21 7:47 ` [Bug debug/105203] [11 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-21 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105203
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:504b02c70abcc31e0e9b56e69f82f85b5261bca9
commit r12-8211-g504b02c70abcc31e0e9b56e69f82f85b5261bca9
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Apr 21 09:43:30 2022 +0200
emit-rtl: Fix -fcompare-debug bug with label references in debug insns
[PR105203]
When we compute LABEL_NUSES from scratch, mark_all_labels doesn't call
mark_jump_label on DEBUG_INSNs:
if (NONDEBUG_INSN_P (insn))
mark_jump_label (PATTERN (insn), insn, 0);
and so doesn't increment LABEL_NUSES from references in DEBUG_INSNs.
But, when we call emit_copy_of_insn_after e.g. when duplicating some
DEBUG_INSNs, we call it even on those, which then results in LABEL_NUSES
differences and -fcompare-debug failures.
The following patch makes sure we don't call it on DEBUG_INSNs.
2022-04-21 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR debug/105203
* emit-rtl.cc (emit_copy_of_insn_after): Don't call mark_jump_label
on DEBUG_INSNs.
* gfortran.dg/g77/pr105203.f: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/105203] [11 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC since r11-3078-g69ca5f3a988266da
2022-04-08 9:59 [Bug debug/105203] New: '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC asolokha at gmx dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-21 7:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-21 7:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-21 7:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-21 7:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105203
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[11/12 Regression] |[11 Regression]
|'-fcompare-debug' failure |'-fcompare-debug' failure
|w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC since |w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC since
|r11-3078-g69ca5f3a988266da |r11-3078-g69ca5f3a988266da
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/105203] [11 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC since r11-3078-g69ca5f3a988266da
2022-04-08 9:59 [Bug debug/105203] New: '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC asolokha at gmx dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-21 7:47 ` [Bug debug/105203] [11 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-21 7:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-21 9:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-21 9:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-21 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105203
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|11.3 |11.4
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 11.3 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 11.4.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/105203] [11 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC since r11-3078-g69ca5f3a988266da
2022-04-08 9:59 [Bug debug/105203] New: '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC asolokha at gmx dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-21 7:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-21 9:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-21 9:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-21 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105203
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
<jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:141b66c4becfa2f2c09b4a6cc0411d995ea5153a
commit r11-9897-g141b66c4becfa2f2c09b4a6cc0411d995ea5153a
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Apr 21 09:43:30 2022 +0200
emit-rtl: Fix -fcompare-debug bug with label references in debug insns
[PR105203]
When we compute LABEL_NUSES from scratch, mark_all_labels doesn't call
mark_jump_label on DEBUG_INSNs:
if (NONDEBUG_INSN_P (insn))
mark_jump_label (PATTERN (insn), insn, 0);
and so doesn't increment LABEL_NUSES from references in DEBUG_INSNs.
But, when we call emit_copy_of_insn_after e.g. when duplicating some
DEBUG_INSNs, we call it even on those, which then results in LABEL_NUSES
differences and -fcompare-debug failures.
The following patch makes sure we don't call it on DEBUG_INSNs.
2022-04-21 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR debug/105203
* emit-rtl.c (emit_copy_of_insn_after): Don't call mark_jump_label
on DEBUG_INSNs.
* gfortran.dg/g77/pr105203.f: New test.
(cherry picked from commit 504b02c70abcc31e0e9b56e69f82f85b5261bca9)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/105203] [11 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC since r11-3078-g69ca5f3a988266da
2022-04-08 9:59 [Bug debug/105203] New: '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftracer -fPIC asolokha at gmx dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-21 9:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-21 9:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-21 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105203
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for 11.4 as well.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread