From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 6900A3858C56; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 19:21:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6900A3858C56
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/105206] mis-optimization with -ffast-math and
 __builtin_powf
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 19:21:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105206-4-DXvXgl4ygS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105206-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105206-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 19:21:52 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105206

--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> -=
--
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 02:45:22PM +0000, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>=20
> This might be related to PR89125.  The patch I attached to that PR has ne=
ver
> found its way into the repository.  I'll do some more testing later today.
>=20

Yep.  This is related to PR89125.  GCC does not use configure
to check for the availability of individual C99 libm functions.
After updating the patch in PR89125 for the *.c to *.cc migration
the patch gcc gives

foof:
.LFB3:
        .cfi_startproc
        mulss   .LC0(%rip), %xmm0
        jmp     expf
        .cfi_endproc

food:
.LFB4:
        .cfi_startproc
        mulsd   .LC1(%rip), %xmm0
        jmp     exp
        .cfi_endproc

fool:
.LFB5:
        .cfi_startproc
        pushq   %rbp
        .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
        .cfi_offset 6, -16
        movq    %rsp, %rbp
        .cfi_def_cfa_register 6
        fldt    16(%rbp)
        popq    %rbp
        .cfi_def_cfa 7, 8
        fldt    .LC2(%rip)
        fmulp   %st, %st(1)
        fldl2e
        fmulp   %st, %st(1)
        fld     %st(0)
        frndint
        fsubr   %st, %st(1)
        fxch    %st(1)
        f2xm1
        fld1
        faddp   %st, %st(1)
        fscale
        fstp    %st(1)
        ret
        .cfi_endproc=