From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id ACC413858C54; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 06:46:27 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ACC413858C54
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/105206] mis-optimization with -ffast-math and
 __builtin_powf
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 06:46:27 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105206-4-TyNv0JJ1SA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105206-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105206-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 06:46:27 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105206

--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105206
>=20
> --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > Hm, it works for me on linux with glibc, can you be more specific as to=
 what
> > OS/libc (version) you are using?
> >=20
> > foof:
> > .LFB0:
> >         .cfi_startproc
> >         mulss   .LC0(%rip), %xmm0
> >         jmp     expf
> >=20
> > food:
> > .LFB1:
> >         .cfi_startproc
> >         mulsd   .LC1(%rip), %xmm0
> >         jmp     exp
>=20
> Richard, I'm using x86_64-*-freebsd.  I just checked with powl(), and got=
=20
> fool:
> .LFB5:
>         .cfi_startproc
>         pushq   %rbp
>         .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
>         .cfi_offset 6, -16
>         movq    %rsp, %rbp
>         .cfi_def_cfa_register 6
>         subq    $16, %rsp
>         flds    .LC0(%rip)
>         pushq   24(%rbp)
>         pushq   16(%rbp)
>         fstpt   -16(%rbp)
>         movq    -16(%rbp), %rax
>         movl    -8(%rbp), %edx
>         pushq   %rdx
>         pushq   %rax
>         call    powl
>         addq    $32, %rsp
>         leave
>         .cfi_def_cfa 7, 8
>         ret
>         .cfi_endproc
>=20
> with -ffast-math.
>=20
> This might be related to PR89125.  The patch I attached to that PR has ne=
ver
> found its way into the repository.  I'll do some more testing later today.

Ah, yeah - that old issue, indeed good to revisit that.=