From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1BB013858D39; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 01:01:12 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1BB013858D39 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1672707672; bh=/288FJnIUShd97w1DMH3Av/9fAO7S3KI5NTTd8AKIWM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tDVEyTM5zJfN0bDcSHmyHiYTNoX/1isdiErM5UPAmrBtqvxdNJ3cQ6dCtLerwNKBA OA3/LkYn/m06fRmt0hk/dc10aArt6Dgdt1Fp4rGepCe/RFDpc+mOg/V8/PNZlvDq+K lLbc5HGThSIXGMpYCuf11p7WbUUNQD68qv4yb5OY= From: "crazylht at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/105216] [12/13 regression] 8% regression for m-queens compared to gcc11 O2 on CLX. since r12-3876-g4a960d548b7d7d94 Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2023 01:01:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: crazylht at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105216 --- Comment #16 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #15) > Might be interesting to test it again to see if it has been fixed on the > trunk. The regression is still there. gcc version 13.0.0 20230102 (experimental) (GCC)=