From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 14A2C3858D3C; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 07:07:34 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 14A2C3858D3C From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/105219] [12 Regression] SVE: Wrong code with -O3 -msve-vector-bits=128 -mtune=thunderx Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 07:07:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 07:07:34 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105219 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target|aarch64 |aarch64, x86_64-*-* --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- int data[128]; void __attribute((noipa)) foo (int *data, int n) { for (int i =3D 0; i < n; ++i) data[i] =3D i; } int main() { for (int start =3D 0; start < 16; ++start) for (int n =3D 1; n < 3*16; ++n) { __builtin_memset (data, 0, sizeof (data)); foo (&data[start], n); for (int j =3D 0; j < n; ++j) if (data[start + j] !=3D j) __builtin_abort (); } return 0; } for example aborts with -O3 -mtune=3Dintel -fno-vect-cost-model on x86_64, the cost model disabling is necessary to have the epilogue vectorized. Without a cost model we peel for the maximum number of aligned refs but still use the target cost to decide whether peeling is worth at all.=