From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7E7433858C60; Fri,  2 Dec 2022 14:07:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7E7433858C60
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1669990078;
	bh=0W8tXXvN9rnMvsFfN97v3TgM7nmcNKTjsSitZgidFAE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=oVvb/blwK9J8Pqtz6Cji/O/5s08F+K+5aueVDv4WyjGT9GqNsAEIZUS9IcZqo1vXM
	 HIuRUjECTwS45TD+SMjAEneWGiXriIkPn7l+RwTptCIw+G8pPauL1gMObIyjPntADa
	 7bvVBOKWLN9L0lDKP9D2EiYghBzsguEuKCy9hI3c=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/105221] [10/11/12/13 Regression] gcc rejects true ?
 [](auto) noexcept {} : [](int) {} in C++17+ (works for C++14)
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 14:07:57 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: c++-lambda, needs-bisection, rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-105221-4-ABQSOtSMvh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105221

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
P0012R1 added what is now http://eel.is/c++draft/temp.deduct.conv#5.2 , at =
that
point:
``If the original A is a function pointer type, A can be "pointer to functi=
on"
even if the deduced A is "pointer to noexcept function".
If the original A is a pointer to member function type, A can be "pointer to
member of type function" even if the deduced A is "pointer to member of type
noexcept function".''
but I don't see in pt.cc anything keyed on DEDUCE_CONV that would deal with
this.=