From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4BFEA3858C56; Tue,  8 Nov 2022 23:24:35 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4BFEA3858C56
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1667949875;
	bh=A/l7Eng8/61fZcj8HDgiWqGzWOBuEebEugibFPE4UEI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=uY3gg5G/MJi92whYrcwrZ8vLxCrx9zWyZ0XXSvRj/1GxspDoYtz5eiDJAAUwWQ2EN
	 imtP99DNQsXnCmxGWtznReq6Gsoi3KY5FCE/VJWASijK6uiSjvtKrFW4+VjpMHBnHW
	 R7Geze8MbDb4vADqnLQlUj7g1SyTH4kQGU8Soxfo=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/105221] [10/11/12/13 Regression] gcc rejects true ?
 [](auto) noexcept {} : [](int) {} in C++17+ (works for C++14)
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2022 23:24:35 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: c++-lambda, needs-bisection, rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc cf_known_to_work keywords
 cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-105221-4-nhH1ryGh9q@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105221

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|gcc rejects true ? [](auto) |[10/11/12/13 Regression]
                   |noexcept {} : [](int) {} in |gcc rejects true ? [](auto)
                   |C++17+ (works for C++14)    |noexcept {} : [](int) {} in
                   |                            |C++17+ (works for C++14)
      Known to work|                            |6.1.0
           Keywords|                            |needs-bisection
      Known to fail|                            |7.1.0, 8.1.0

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Worked in GCC 6 even with an explict -std=3Dc++17 .=