From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B322B39960E4; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 13:33:17 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B322B39960E4 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1668691997; bh=De7/b6R7wQvjUfiJ0/m3vegb+mQXLEfOYn+Wwo320Ck=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DQtHyNeobZe5o8aW8tsADPpnTTVUx5XKNRahr6dT1MnzhzLvSU5ZpRp/D+zjvMAfI kvSHb9ya22I5DQwAISe2Awba3an4s1jaByNVDggozz9CXdaZ3iGcN2yzd5XL1QFnH6 tEpsU71HkSUAQYjf6B2zQrmkQzYkR7LJ1jeWZar0= From: "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/105278] -Wliteral-range vs -Wfloat-equal Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 13:33:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105278 --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > I don't think clang implements -Wfloat-equal at all, at least they didn't= at > the last time I looked a few years back. I just checked their diagnostics reference page and it says that they do: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html#wfloat-equal=