From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 54D683858D35; Sun, 21 May 2023 14:13:12 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 54D683858D35 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1684678392; bh=0Psu9W9E4f6/9oo12gWLQ6TnJ6vOOpLJcHjqpO9lad0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XmRwUmSw9ctHYtKFJaNiWy2sfAQmt8t8QC7UKpWDWRWmhxrt3xyWzo2+6k0pKwW2E N/eu/G5yH2TM5WUd/v5vCoTrOI0tKW3cv7pgKYmwQKmHOA16KRFqFSVhJUvRYrixUQ gG8iZMO6af7W0Q3+9bOv0bElUyuEiu73LISnyr1c= From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/105289] [11 Regression] ICE on partial specialization Date: Sun, 21 May 2023 14:13:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105289 Patrick Palka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Patrick Palka --- Fixed -- PR86193 remains open to deal with the question of validity of such partial specializations.=