From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D4F283858C50; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 01:17:11 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D4F283858C50 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1712971031; bh=f8Ir+UrG0Xx4wGsnmKbgqNigNUXd4ghF02QcXOmUidg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=x3A5X7cZvczG/wbWsOonJWThhKPwGDynlaiUbe+3mpiv/KzVXiGJsf5xEHzkVDlEM bj4HwzUI8j4Vuul6EBW5oKP+jdMJ5EOY05bo5fPiVDk4jOFoY3de71B8uzz21T4afw qAv8Fk+hblPLo19V/8u949Xc9ZUE3U4jT/kSQqYw= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/105293] g++-8/i586: internal compiler error trying to compile with g++ (evtl. related to qt5/moc bug) Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 01:17:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105293 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Target Milestone|--- |9.0 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > Note that GCC 8 is no longer maintained and you should be using the last > release from this branch, GCC 8.5. Can you check whether GCC 9.4 or later > work correctly? Since r9-1060-g31db0fe044cc9d, the code related to chkp (and chkp_function_instrumented_p) is removed so I am going to assume this was f= ixed for GCC 9. Plus there is no testcase to prove it so just closing as invalid.=