From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 667C83858D37; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:11:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 667C83858D37 From: "jan at twosigma dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/105344] New: std::source_location::curent() seemingly treated as a pure function in template specializations Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:11:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jan at twosigma dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:11:27 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105344 Bug ID: 105344 Summary: std::source_location::curent() seemingly treated as a pure function in template specializations Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jan at twosigma dot com Target Milestone: --- When using std::source_location::current().line() in certain contexts on two different lines, gcc seems to incorrectly think the expression refers to the same value. Testcase: #include #include template struct foo; // Two following two specializations are different, yet gcc errors out, // claiming they are the same. template struct foo> { static constexpr int num =3D i; }; template struct foo> { static constexpr int num =3D i; }; This outputs: :14:8: error: redefinition of 'struct foo= ::type>' 14 | struct foo> { |=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ :9:8: note: previous definition of 'struct foo::type>' 9 | struct foo> { |=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Compiler returned: 1 https://godbolt.org/z/ozf1MbG3n shows this code works fine under MSVC.=