[Bug middle-end/105346] [11/12 Regression] -Wno-free-nonheap-object false positive (on Bison-generated grammar code)

["rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105346

--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
A possible fix would be to not run the late checks when not optimizing - in
fact
the IL for the late and early pass are the same at -O0 so the reason for
postponing them isn't there.  The only difference is inlining of always-inline
functions where one could argue we should do most -O0 diagnostics at that
state anyway.

Like with the following.  Alternatively at -O0 the very first pass instance
could do all checking but within a similar construct as the immediately
preceeding early -Wuninitialized.

diff --git a/gcc/passes.def b/gcc/passes.def
index 375d3d62d51..0442b85ee1b 100644
--- a/gcc/passes.def
+++ b/gcc/passes.def
@@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
          number of false positives from it.  */
       NEXT_PASS (pass_split_crit_edges);
       NEXT_PASS (pass_late_warn_uninitialized);
+      NEXT_PASS (pass_warn_access, /*early=*/false);
       /* uncprop replaces constants by SSA names.  This makes analysis harder
         and thus it should be run last.  */
       NEXT_PASS (pass_uncprop);
@@ -428,7 +429,6 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
   NEXT_PASS (pass_gimple_isel);
   NEXT_PASS (pass_harden_conditional_branches);
   NEXT_PASS (pass_harden_compares);
-  NEXT_PASS (pass_warn_access, /*early=*/false);
   NEXT_PASS (pass_cleanup_cfg_post_optimizing);
   NEXT_PASS (pass_warn_function_noreturn);