From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id AA80E385801E; Tue,  3 May 2022 14:00:47 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AA80E385801E
From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/105351] [concepts] Constraint checking does correctly match
 static member attributes
Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 14:00:47 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-105351-4-yD5yrkyFOz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105351-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105351-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 14:00:47 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105351

Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Gawain Bolton from comment #4)
> Finally, this also begs the question as to how one could write a requirem=
ent
> to ensure a class has a static attribute.

One way is to replace the requirement 'T::attr2' with 'typename
dummy<&T::attr2>' where 'dummy' is the class template

  template<auto*> struct dummy;

This works because template arguments are constant expressions, and constant
expressions are evaluated even in unevaluated contexts, so the bullet point
that ensadc pointed out in comment #3 no longer applies.

This makes both Clang and GCC happy: https://godbolt.org/z/c8q355hfh=