From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 686833858D33; Sun, 24 Apr 2022 19:57:05 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 686833858D33
From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/105361] Incorrect end-of-file condition for
 derived-type I/O
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 19:57:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105361-4-imcKazg0bj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105361-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105361-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 19:57:05 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105361

--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This "fixes" the bug in question, but is almost certainly entirely
incorrect for a lot of other cases.  Will have to look a bit further.

--- a/libgfortran/io/list_read.c
+++ b/libgfortran/io/list_read.c
@@ -2364,13 +2364,13 @@ finish_list_read (st_parameter_dt *dtp)
       if (likely (dtp->u.p.child_saved_iostat =3D=3D LIBERROR_OK))
        {
          c =3D next_char (dtp);
          if (c =3D=3D EOF)
            {
              free_line (dtp);
-             hit_eof (dtp);
+             // hit_eof (dtp);
              return;
            }
          if (c !=3D '\n')
            eat_line (dtp);
        }
     }=