From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C6F6F3858D28; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 07:02:20 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C6F6F3858D28 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/105367] [12 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in contains_struct_check (tree.h:3570) with -Ofast -mveclibabi=acml Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 07:02:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cf_gcctarget cf_gcchost target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 07:02:20 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105367 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2022-04-25 Target| |x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* Host|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu | Target Milestone|--- |12.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Confirmed. ix86_veclibabi_acml expects mathfn_built_in to work on modes but the function instead relies on stricter type equality and thus returns NULL for _Float64. Note mathfn_built_in is only used to get at the base name for the function, it might be easier to manually cover that for the fixed set of functions.=