From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 3BF013858D1E; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 11:32:39 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3BF013858D1E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1671622359;
	bh=74AEun8y96tFWEdtBfDPvgABDS+9o0ACfyQsk6H3PNE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ZxPlELUCm3KGPD3B8aR0FeJp4M8RELMYMUWbPxozF5XsJwgDN1j7kSFm35R+iXnSQ
	 pnzlXZQ2gWkH2YAUmDnCrlmVc6fCNElLa3S2PzA4SyBt5U9f1GOjsND1JQMC7J9CHB
	 nLbhaJ+cBYEuWZY8cfFsxH17wuDxdNvn0hrrAvog=
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/105397] C++ modules vs -fvisibility option
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 11:32:38 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105397-4-2x4jMKpEKg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105397-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105397-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105397

--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
the import places attributes at the end.

so=20
import module Foo [[....]];

it would seem to be symmetrical to have:

export import Foo [[...]];
export module Foo [[...]];

but, ts present, (if I read it correctly) it seems that the WD says

export [[...]] module Foo;
export [[...]] int bar ();

which would then be weird with export [[...]] import Foo [[...]];=