From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id AEEDA3858C2C; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 10:04:48 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AEEDA3858C2C
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/105415] [9/10/11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure
 w/ -O2 -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 since r7-4900-g59ec925b1199f9
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 10:04:48 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compare-debug-failure
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105415-4-TCYzgOAkje@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105415-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105415-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 10:04:48 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105415

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Wonder about:
--- gcc/alias.cc.jj     2022-02-21 16:51:50.261232505 +0100
+++ gcc/alias.cc        2022-04-28 11:57:18.940425126 +0200
@@ -2219,8 +2219,10 @@ compare_base_symbol_refs (const_rtx x_ba
          || (!TREE_STATIC (x_decl) && !TREE_PUBLIC (x_decl)))
        return 0;

-      symtab_node *x_node =3D symtab_node::get_create (x_decl)
-                           ->ultimate_alias_target ();
+      symtab_node *x_node =3D symtab_node::get (x_decl);
+      if (x_node =3D=3D NULL)
+       return 0;
+      x_node =3D x_node->ultimate_alias_target ();
       /* External variable cannot be in section anchor.  */
       if (!x_node->definition)
        return 0;
It would surprise me if we needed to create varpool nodes so late, if they
don't exist, with the exception of DEBUG_INSNs referencing already removed
symbols I don't see the reason why the varpool nodes wouldn't be present.
Another option would be for the x_node =3D=3D NULL case to use x_decl rathe=
r than
x_node->decl, i.e. just assume x_decl isn't an alias if it doesn't have a
varpool node.=