From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8A01B3857018; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 13:44:19 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8A01B3857018 From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/105417] [11/12/13 Regression] powerpc64le-linux abilist changes based on --with-long-double-format= Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 13:44:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 13:44:19 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105417 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:621650f64fb6679c457c33abf27c925f28bddc62 commit r12-8321-g621650f64fb6679c457c33abf27c925f28bddc62 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date: Fri Apr 29 12:17:13 2022 +0100 libstdc++: Add missing exports for ppc64le --with-long-double-format=3D= ibm [PR105417] The --with-long-double-abi=3Dibm build is missing some exports that are present in the --with-long-double-abi=3Dieee build. Those symbols never should have been exported at all, but now that they have been, they should be exported consistently by both ibm and ieee. This simply defines them as aliases for equivalent symbols that are already present. The abi-tag on num_get::_M_extract_int isn't really needed, because it only uses a std::string as a local variable, not in the return type or function parameters, so it's safe to define the _M_extract_int[abi:cxx11] symbols as aliases for the corresponding function without the abi-tag. This causes some new symbols to be added to the GLIBCXX_3.4.29 version for the ibm long double build mode, but there is no advantage to adding them to 3.4.30 for that build. That would just create more inconsistencies. libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: PR libstdc++/105417 * config/abi/post/powerpc64-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: Regenerate. * src/c++11/compatibility-ldbl-alt128.cc [_GLIBCXX_USE_DUAL_ABI= ]: Define __gnu_ieee128::num_get::_M_extract_int[abi:cxx11] symbols as aliases for corresponding symbols without abi-tag. (cherry picked from commit bb7cf39b05a216431a431499d0c36a6034f6acc4)=