public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/105420] Bogus -Warray-bounds with non-compile time-constant variable
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 06:26:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-105420-4-bSccF8jmvS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-105420-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105420

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
           Keywords|                            |diagnostic
             Blocks|                            |56456
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-04-29
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC threads the Initialize_type check and effectively sees

  if (Initialize_type)
    {
      if (virt_core >= 0)
        return;
      int phys_core = VirtualToPhysicalCoreMap[virt_core]; // virt_core is
negative
      if (phys_core)
        external();
    }
  else
    {
       int phys_core = VirtualToPhysicalCoreMap[virt_core];
       if (phys_core && Initialize_type == Kernel)
         external();
    }

it should probably warn that virt_core is negative, not that it is literally -1
here.

I agree the diagnostic can be improved, but telling the user the execution
path considered is probably difficult (at best we might somehow be able to
emit a maybe warning).

Still there's an obvious defect in your program that's worth fixing, possibly
by refactoring of this code.


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
[Bug 56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-29  6:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-28 13:21 [Bug tree-optimization/105420] New: " byteslice at airmail dot cc
2022-04-29  6:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-04-29 11:42 ` [Bug tree-optimization/105420] " byteslice at airmail dot cc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-105420-4-bSccF8jmvS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).