From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 3F3F3385842B; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:20:03 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3F3F3385842B
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/105436] [13 Regression] parse error with >= operator
 expression in template argument list in C++14 mode since r13-40
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:20:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105436-4-Fnj1GZYUE4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105436-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105436-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:20:03 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105436

--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think the fix is just

--- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
@@ -33224,7 +33224,6 @@ cp_parser_next_token_ends_template_argument_p
(cp_parser *parser)
      || ((cxx_dialect !=3D cxx98) && token->type =3D=3D CPP_RSHIFT)
      /* For better diagnostics, treat >>=3D like that too, that
         shouldn't appear non-nested in template arguments.  */
-     || token->type =3D=3D CPP_GREATER_EQ
      || token->type =3D=3D CPP_RSHIFT_EQ);
 }


it doesn't regress anything and fixes this test.  Probably just an oversigh=
t,
the code doesn't match the comment.=