From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 2630D3857371; Wed,  4 May 2022 14:43:48 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2630D3857371
From: "roland at logikalsolutions dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/105470] ranged for loop whitespace parsing
Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 14:43:48 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: roland at logikalsolutions dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105470-4-wyVac41t3R@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105470-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105470-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 14:43:48 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105470

--- Comment #11 from Roland Hughes <roland at logikalsolutions dot com> ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #9)
> (In reply to Roland Hughes from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> > > Can you please provide a stand-alone test case?
> >=20
> > I will work on this over the weekend.
>=20
> Looks like that's not necessary anymore.  Jon already explained why.

It is actually necessary, see my other comment.

There is no declaration anywhere in the code base where the map contains a
constant value.

This is not resolved.=