From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 66523385C30C; Sat, 4 Jun 2022 03:47:49 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 66523385C30C From: "harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/105473] semicolon allowed when list-directed read integer with decimal='point' Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2022 03:47:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.4.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2022 03:47:49 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105473 --- Comment #23 from harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz --- Given what "undefined" means in Fortran, I see no bug now. On Fri, 3 Jun 2022, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 21:04:22 +0000 > From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org > To: John Harper > Subject: [Bug fortran/105473] semicolon allowed when list-directed read > integer with decimal=3D'point' > Resent-Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2022 09:04:35 +1200 (NZST) > Resent-From: >=20 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105473 > > --- Comment #22 from Jerry DeLisle --- > 12.11.2 (6) says "if the statement is a READ statement or the error > condition occurs in a wait operation for a transfer initiated by a READ > statement, all input items or namelist group objects in the statement that > initiated the transfer become undefined;" > > By undefined, it means you cant rely on it whether or not it has a value = read > into it or not. It is undefined by the standard and to the user, so it c= ould > be anything, > > There was one last place I am going to check in the code before I am done. > (maybe ;)) > > Regarding NAG, yes we always use to like to see that interpretation. > > --=20 > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. > -- John Harper, School of Mathematics and Statistics Victoria Univ. of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand. e-mail john.harper@vuw.ac.nz phone +64(0) 4 463 5276=