From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 05F1B385AC29; Wed,  2 Nov 2022 17:16:40 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 05F1B385AC29
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1667409400;
	bh=Hc0sYKc3LFfK/ReesQcBHivG9x4iUGyobEXGW2XJ4dc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=nPEOsoYG83rjbBVzYEA1V5bwTreICU3uStVa3AkT8flapIhFOHqW67vydJOe4ZgPE
	 XCpY1/AoENKP5NkxT0/pmckwSq7pElgTuIXMoPb8G72+jTixTHEjM79gkVw86UNX7m
	 NBnyDaU032qp8R+87/LCZqkkjJL9nqCYyaUerHDg=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/105483] [10/11/12/13 Regression] injected-class-name and
 constructors diagnostic
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2022 17:16:39 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_work everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on
 short_desc target_milestone cf_known_to_fail keywords bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-105483-4-ltvLs8Pys6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105483

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to work|                            |7.1.0
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-11-02
            Summary|injected-class-name and     |[10/11/12/13 Regression]
                   |constructors diagnostic     |injected-class-name and
                   |                            |constructors diagnostic
   Target Milestone|---                         |10.5
      Known to fail|                            |8.1.0
           Keywords|                            |needs-bisection
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 7 produces:
<source>: In function 'void g()':
<source>:6:3: error: 'X::X' names the constructor, not the type
   X::X x;
   ^
<source>:6:8: error: expected ';' before 'x'
   X::X x;
        ^
<source>:6:9: error: statement cannot resolve address of overloaded function
   X::X x;
         ^

While GCC 8 produces the __ct diagnostic. At least that part is a regressio=
n.=