public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/105499] New: inconsistency between -Werror=c++-compat and g++ in __extension__ block
Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 00:12:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-105499-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105499

            Bug ID: 105499
           Summary: inconsistency between -Werror=c++-compat and g++ in
                    __extension__ block
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
  Target Milestone: ---

Consider

int *f (void *q)
{
  return __extension__ ({ int *p = q; p; });
}

With GCC 11.3.0 under Debian (Debian package), I get the following:

$ gcc -Werror=c++-compat -c tst.c
$ g++ -c tst.c
tst.c: In function ‘int* f(void*)’:
tst.c:3:36: error: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘int*’ [-fpermissive]
    3 |   return __extension__ ({ int *p = q; p; });
      |                                    ^
      |                                    |
      |                                    void*

so no errors with "gcc -Werror=c++-compat", but an error with g++. This is not
consistent. Either this is regarded as a valid extension in C++ so that both
should succeed, or this is not valid C++ code even in __extension__ so that
both should fail.

Same issue with various GCC versions from 4.9 to 11.3.0.

AFAIK, the purpose of -Wc++-compat is to test whether code would still pass
when replacing C compilation by C++ (there might be false positives or false
negatives, but this should not be the case with the above example).

FYI, I got the above issue while testing GNU MPFR (tested with
-Werror=c++-compat first, and with g++ a bit later in a more extensive test).

             reply	other threads:[~2022-05-06  0:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-06  0:12 vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net [this message]
2022-05-06  4:09 ` [Bug c++/105499] " egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-06  9:17 ` vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
2022-10-31  7:45 ` [Bug c/105499] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-31  7:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-31 12:34 ` vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
2022-10-31 14:17 ` vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
2022-10-31 14:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-01  3:21 ` vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-105499-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).